Aggressor-Victim Dissent in Perceived Legitimacy of Aggression in Soccer: The Moderating Role of Situational Background - Université Paris Nanterre Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport Année : 2010

Aggressor-Victim Dissent in Perceived Legitimacy of Aggression in Soccer: The Moderating Role of Situational Background

Olivier Rascle
Alan Traclet
  • Fonction : Auteur
Genevieve Cabagno
  • Fonction : Auteur
Carrie Petrucci
  • Fonction : Auteur

Résumé

The purpose of this study was to investigate the aggressor-victim difference in perceived legitimacy of aggression in soccer as a function of score information (tied, favorable, unfavorable), sporting penalization (no risk, yellow card, red card), and type of aggression (instrumental, hostile). French male soccer players (N = 133) read written scenarios and rated the legitimacy of the described aggressive act depending on a specific perspective (aggressor or victim) and situational information. A significant aggressor-victim difference in perception of instrumental aggression was found in situations where the score was tied or where there was no risk to be caught. In addition, aggressors were affected by such information, whereas victims were not. The discussion focuses on explanations and implications of such divergences in aggressive sport situations.
Fichier non déposé

Dates et versions

hal-01469897 , version 1 (16-02-2017)

Identifiants

Citer

Olivier Rascle, Alan Traclet, Nicolas Souchon, Genevieve Cabagno, Carrie Petrucci. Aggressor-Victim Dissent in Perceived Legitimacy of Aggression in Soccer: The Moderating Role of Situational Background. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 2010, 81 (3), pp.340-348. ⟨10.1080/02701367.2010.10599682⟩. ⟨hal-01469897⟩
26 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More