A Multi-Site Collaborative Study of the Hostile Priming Effect
Randy McCarthy
,
Will Gervais
,
Balazs Aczel
,
Rosemary Al-Kire
,
Mark Aveyard
,
Silvia Marcella Baraldo
,
Lemi Baruh
,
Charlotte Basch
,
Anna Baumert
,
Anna Behler
,
Ann Bettencourt
,
Adam Bitar
,
Hugo Bouxom
,
Ashley Buck
,
Zeynep Cemalcilar
,
Peggy Chekroun
(1)
,
Jacqueline Chen
,
Ángel del Fresno- Díaz
,
Alec Ducham
,
John Edlund
,
Amanda Elbassiouny
,
Thomas Rhys Evans
,
Patrick Ewell
,
Patrick Forscher
,
Paul Fuglestad
,
Lauren Hauck
,
Christopher Hawk
,
Anthony Hermann
,
Bryon Hines
,
Mukunzi Irumva
,
Lauren Jordan
,
Jennifer Joy-Gaba
,
Catherine Haley
,
Pavol Kačmár
,
Murat Kezer
,
Robert Körner
,
Muriel Kosaka
,
Marton Kovacs
,
Elicia Lair
,
Jean-Baptiste Légal
(1)
,
Dana Leighton
,
Michael Magee
,
Keith Markman
,
Marcel Martončik
,
Martin Müller
,
Jasmine Norman
,
Jerome Olsen
,
Danielle Oyler
,
Curtis Phills
,
Gianni Ribeiro
,
Alia Rohain
,
John Sakaluk
,
Astrid Schütz
,
Daniel Toribio-Flórez
,
Jo-Ann Tsang
,
Michela Vezzoli
,
Caitlin Williams
,
Guillermo Willis
,
Jason Young
,
Cristina Zogmaister
Randy McCarthy
- Function : Author
Will Gervais
- Function : Author
Balazs Aczel
- Function : Author
Rosemary Al-Kire
- Function : Author
Mark Aveyard
- Function : Author
Silvia Marcella Baraldo
- Function : Author
Lemi Baruh
- Function : Author
Charlotte Basch
- Function : Author
Anna Baumert
- Function : Author
Anna Behler
- Function : Author
Ann Bettencourt
- Function : Author
Adam Bitar
- Function : Author
Hugo Bouxom
- Function : Author
Ashley Buck
- Function : Author
Zeynep Cemalcilar
- Function : Author
Peggy Chekroun
- Function : Author
- PersonId : 180951
- IdHAL : peggy-chekroun
- ORCID : 0000-0002-2520-2157
- IdRef : 069675694
Jacqueline Chen
- Function : Author
Ángel del Fresno- Díaz
- Function : Author
Alec Ducham
- Function : Author
John Edlund
- Function : Author
Amanda Elbassiouny
- Function : Author
Thomas Rhys Evans
- Function : Author
Patrick Ewell
- Function : Author
Patrick Forscher
- Function : Author
Paul Fuglestad
- Function : Author
Lauren Hauck
- Function : Author
Christopher Hawk
- Function : Author
Anthony Hermann
- Function : Author
Bryon Hines
- Function : Author
Mukunzi Irumva
- Function : Author
Lauren Jordan
- Function : Author
Jennifer Joy-Gaba
- Function : Author
Catherine Haley
- Function : Author
Pavol Kačmár
- Function : Author
Murat Kezer
- Function : Author
Robert Körner
- Function : Author
Muriel Kosaka
- Function : Author
Marton Kovacs
- Function : Author
Elicia Lair
- Function : Author
Dana Leighton
- Function : Author
Michael Magee
- Function : Author
Keith Markman
- Function : Author
Marcel Martončik
- Function : Author
Martin Müller
- Function : Author
Jasmine Norman
- Function : Author
Jerome Olsen
- Function : Author
Danielle Oyler
- Function : Author
Curtis Phills
- Function : Author
Gianni Ribeiro
- Function : Author
Alia Rohain
- Function : Author
John Sakaluk
- Function : Author
Astrid Schütz
- Function : Author
Daniel Toribio-Flórez
- Function : Author
Jo-Ann Tsang
- Function : Author
Michela Vezzoli
- Function : Author
Caitlin Williams
- Function : Author
Guillermo Willis
- Function : Author
Jason Young
- Function : Author
Cristina Zogmaister
- Function : Author
Abstract
In a now-classic study by Srull and Wyer (1979), people who were exposed to phrases with hostile content subsequently judged a man as being more hostile. And this “hostile priming effect” has had a significant influence on the field of social cognition over the subsequent decades. However, a recent multi-lab collaborative study (McCarthy et al., 2018) that closely followed the methods described by Srull and Wyer (1979) found a hostile priming effect that was nearly zero, which casts doubt on whether these methods reliably produce an effect. To address some limitations with McCarthy et al. (2018), the current multi-site collaborative study included data collected from 29 labs. Each lab conducted a close replication (total N = 2,123) and a conceptual replication (total N = 2,579) of Srull and Wyer’s methods. The hostile priming effect for both the close replication (d = 0.09, 95% CI [-0.04, 0.22], z = 1.34, p = .16) and the conceptual replication (d = 0.05, 95% CI [-0.04, 0.15], z = 1.15, p = .58) were not significantly different from zero and, if the true effects are non-zero, were smaller than what most labs could feasibly and routinely detect. Despite our best efforts to produce favorable conditions for the effect to emerge, we did not detect a hostile priming effect. We suggest that researchers should not invest more resources into trying to detect a hostile priming effect using methods like those described in Srull and Wyer (1979).